2005 Acura RSX vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 2000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 326 kg more than 2005 Acura RSX.

Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura RSX. (191 Nm). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura RSX. 2005 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 2002 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Acura RSX 2002 Nissan X-Trail
Make Acura Nissan
Model RSX X-Trail
Year Released 2005 2002
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 112 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 2000 RPM
Torque 191 Nm 270 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 16.0:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1274 kg 1600 kg
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2540 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.4 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]