2005 Acura RSX vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 210 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 575 kg more than 2005 Acura RSX.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (334 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura RSX. (194 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | RSX | Frontier |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1256 kg | 1831 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 73 L |