2005 Acura RSX vs. 2011 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC90 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Acura RSX would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (210 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2011 Volvo XC90. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 899 kg more than 2005 Acura RSX.
Because 2011 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC90 (420 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura RSX. (194 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 2011 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | RSX | XC90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 194 Nm | 420 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1256 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |