2005 Acura TL vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Acura TL is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura TL (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura TL weights approximately 418 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura TL (323 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm). This means 2005 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura TL | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Acura | Triumph |
Model | TL | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 198 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1613 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |