2005 Acura TL vs. 1970 AMC AMX III
To start off, 2005 Acura TL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2005 Acura TL. (270 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura TL.
Because 1970 AMC AMX III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 AMC AMX III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1970 AMC AMX III has manual transmission. 1970 AMC AMX III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura TL | 1970 AMC AMX III | |
| Make | Acura | AMC |
| Model | TL | AMX III |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 6375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 341 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 105.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90.7 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |
