2005 Acura TL vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Acura TL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura TL (270 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura TL (323 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2005 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura TL | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Acura | Mitsubishi |
Model | TL | FTO |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 323 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |