2005 Acura TL vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2005 Acura TL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2005 Acura TL. (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura TL weights approximately 475 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura TL. (323 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura TL | 2002 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Acura | BMW |
| Model | TL | M3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3209 cc | 3997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2890 mm |
