2005 Acura TL vs. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 521 more horse power than 2005 Acura TL. (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura TL.
Because 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm) has 477 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura TL. (323 Nm). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura TL. 2005 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept has manual transmission. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura TL | 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | |
Make | Acura | Dodge |
Model | TL | Charger RT Concept |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 791 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 800 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption | 8.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |