2005 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2005 Alfa Romeo 147.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 147 | 62 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 5676 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3210 mm |