2005 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1963 Riley 4
To start off, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley 4 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 (99 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1963 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 weights approximately 202 kg more than 1963 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Riley 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Riley 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 (200 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley 4. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1963 Riley 4 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Riley |
Model | 147 | 4 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 200 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.4:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |