2005 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk
To start off, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Pontiac Firehawk would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk weights approximately 356 kg more than 2005 Alfa Romeo 147.
Because 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk (464 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Alfa Romeo 147. (147 Nm). This means 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Alfa Romeo 147.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1995 Pontiac Firehawk | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Pontiac |
| Model | 147 | Firehawk |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 464 Nm |
| Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 257 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1681 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 54 L |
