2005 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 (173 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Commander. (140 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 170 kg more than 2005 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1954 Studebaker Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Studebaker Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Studebaker |
| Model | 156 | Commander |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 3673 cc |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 90.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 71.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1420 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3070 mm |
