2005 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2000 Citroen Xanae
To start off, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xanae. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xanae would be higher. At 1,969 cc, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 (173 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (58 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xanae. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 116 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xanae. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 (187 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xanae.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2000 Citroen Xanae | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
| Model | 156 | Xanae |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1587 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 58 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 78.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 82 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1134 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2550 mm |
