2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon vs. 1954 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 48 kg more than 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon | 1954 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | Crosswagon | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 5114 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
