2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon (148 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon has manual transmission. 2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Alfa Romeo Crosswagon | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Crosswagon | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |