2005 Alpina B3 vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2005 Alpina B3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Alpina B3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Alpina B3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Alpina B3. (362 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Alpina B3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Alpina B3 | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Alpina | Holden |
| Model | B3 | Maloo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3346 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 362 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
