2005 Alpina B3 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2005 Alpina B3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Alpina B3 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Alpina B3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Alpina B3 (362 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Alpina B3 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Alpina | Mitsubishi |
| Model | B3 | SSU |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3346 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 362 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 71 L |
