2005 Ariel Atom vs. 1978 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ariel Atom is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1020 kg more than 2005 Ariel Atom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2005 Ariel Atom has manual transmission. 2005 Ariel Atom will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ariel Atom | 1978 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Ariel | Ford |
Model | Atom | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2760 mm |