2005 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Aston Martin DB9 (444 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 406 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Aston Martin DB9 | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Aston Martin | Lotus |
Model | DB9 | Seven |
Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 29 L |