2005 Audi A2 vs. 1963 Austin A 90
To start off, 2005 Audi A2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2005 Audi A2. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 90 weights approximately 640 kg more than 2005 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A2. (140 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1963 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A2 | 1963 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | A2 | A 90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1190 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 34 L |