2005 Audi A2 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2005 Audi A2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A2 (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 180 kg more than 2005 Audi A2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A2 (140 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A2 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | A2 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1190 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
