2005 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2005 Audi A3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Cougar (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Audi A3. (113 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 85 kg more than 2005 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A3. (156 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Audi A3 2000 Mercury Cougar
Make Audi Mercury
Model A3 Cougar
Year Released 2005 2000
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 1983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 113 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 156 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1225 kg 1310 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2710 mm