2005 Audi A3 vs. 2003 BMW M3
To start off, 2005 Audi A3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2005 Audi A3. (139 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A3.
Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A3. (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A3 | 2003 BMW M3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | A3 | M3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3168 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 342 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7900 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 207 km/hour | 259 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 4.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 63 L |