2005 Audi A3 vs. 2012 Nissan NP300

To start off, 2012 Nissan NP300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NP300 (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Audi A3. (139 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A3 weights approximately 56 kg more than 2012 Nissan NP300.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan NP300. (205 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan NP300.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Audi A3 2012 Nissan NP300
Make Audi Nissan
Model A3 NP300
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Hatchback Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 2389 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 139 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 205 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 9.2:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1385 kg 1329 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 5180 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2960 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.5 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 75 L