2005 Audi A3 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1404 kg more than 2005 Audi A3.
Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 564 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A3. (156 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A3 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | A3 | Phantom |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.9 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1598 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 100 L |