2005 Audi A4 vs. 1948 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A4 (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A4 (300 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 1948 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A4 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2005 | 1948 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |