2005 Audi A4 vs. 1961 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A4 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 285 kg more than 2005 Audi A4.
Because 1961 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 1961 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A4 | Sixty |
Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 6388 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 582 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2165 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3300 mm |