2005 Audi A4 vs. 1962 Zastava 750
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A4 (220 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A4 (300 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A4 | 1962 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | A4 | 750 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 766 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 46 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 605 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2010 mm |
