2005 Audi A4 vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A4 | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | A4 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 5736 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1610 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2960 mm |
