2005 Audi A4 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A4 (160 HP @ 1950 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A4 (225 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | A4 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 1950 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 25 L |