2005 Audi A4 vs. 1976 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A4 (170 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1976 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1976 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 456 kg more than 1976 Datsun 260Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A4 (230 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 1976 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Audi | Datsun |
Model | A4 | 260Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2581 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |