2005 Audi A4 vs. 1981 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,785 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A4 (174 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A4 (230 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 1981 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | A4 | Cervo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1785 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2040 mm |