2005 Audi A4 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4.
Because 2005 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A4 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | A4 | Etna |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 95.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2520 mm |
