2005 Audi A4 vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass (177 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (170 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 191 kg more than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A4 (230 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (217 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A4 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2740 mm |