2005 Audi A4 vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XK8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XK8 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 86 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XK8.
Because 2005 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XK8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A4 | XK8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 420 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 75 L |