2005 Audi A4 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 Audi A4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A4 (247 HP) has 177 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A4 (320 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Audi | MCC |
Model | A4 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 1810 mm |