2005 Audi A4 vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A4 would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Audi A4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Audi | Land Rover |
Model | A4 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4367 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.8 seconds | 7.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2891 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 104 L |