2005 Audi A4 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 86 kg more than 2005 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A4 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3700 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1966 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |