2005 Audi A4 vs. 2012 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2012 GMC Acadia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 GMC Acadia (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (217 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Acadia weights approximately 414 kg more than 2005 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 GMC Acadia (366 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm). This means 2012 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 2012 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | A4 | Acadia |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 366 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1698 kg | 2112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1986 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3020 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 83 L |