2005 Audi A4 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (217 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A4 weights approximately 128 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A4 | ATS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 11.5 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1698 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 61 L |