2005 Audi A4 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (217 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 666 kg more than 2005 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A4 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1698 kg | 2364 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 93 L |