2005 Audi A4 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2005 Audi A4. (217 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 93 kg more than 2005 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A4. (300 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A4 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | A4 | XC60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1698 kg | 1791 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2774 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |