2005 Audi A6 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 149 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Hudson Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A6 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Audi | Hudson |
| Model | A6 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3160 mm |
