2005 Audi A6 vs. 1952 Austin A
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1952 Austin A. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A weights approximately 330 kg more than 2005 Audi A6.
Because 1952 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A. (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1952 Austin A | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | A6 | A |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 3992 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 288 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1975 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 34 L |