2005 Audi A6 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 550 kg more than 2005 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A6 | 62 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 6390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 2195 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |