2005 Audi A6 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 2,496 cc, 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 498 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Singer Vogue III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Singer Vogue III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
Make | Audi | Singer |
Model | A6 | Vogue III |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1592 cc |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.3 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76.2 mm |
Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1092 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |