2005 Audi A6 vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (217 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 551 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A6 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2430 mm |