2005 Audi A6 vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (217 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 875 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | A6 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 33 L |