2005 Audi A6 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi A6 (218 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | A6 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 25 L |