2005 Audi A6 vs. 1967 Bizzarrini A3C
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (335 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi A6. (420 Nm). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | |
Make | Audi | Bizzarrini |
Model | A6 | A3C |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 361 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 510 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2460 mm |